<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stumbleupon vs Digg &#8211; Comscore Statistics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://graviton.me/stumbleupon-vs-digg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://graviton.me/stumbleupon-vs-digg/</link>
	<description>Graviton.me is a personal blog of Artur Szalak. You will find here my thoughts about marketing, social media and user experience in today&#039;s world plus some analysis based on statistics from various sources.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 18:35:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Artur Szalak</title>
		<link>http://graviton.me/stumbleupon-vs-digg/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Artur Szalak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 18:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://graviton.me/?p=358#comment-55</guid>
		<description>Hi Urs!
First of all, thank you for visiting my blog. I am an active reader of your ComMetrics blog. Great work with great insights.I know I&#039;m replying late, but hadn&#039;t had much time recently to update graviton.me nor do anything about it really. Also, lost access to Comscore. Hoping that will change soon, though.
Regarding Stumbleupon, it&#039;s not as bad as Digg nowadays. Recently I made one (and only one in total) comment there and received lots of followers that clearly are spam accounts. In the end, everything depends on type of audience you&#039;re looking for. Stumbleupon is probably one of the best places for disseminating &quot;after-work-graphical-content&quot; as I like to call it.
Again, thank you for visiting my blog and your comment. Highly appreciated!
All the best and keep up the great work.
Cheers
Artur</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Urs!<br />
First of all, thank you for visiting my blog. I am an active reader of your ComMetrics blog. Great work with great insights.I know I&#8217;m replying late, but hadn&#8217;t had much time recently to update graviton.me nor do anything about it really. Also, lost access to Comscore. Hoping that will change soon, though.<br />
Regarding Stumbleupon, it&#8217;s not as bad as Digg nowadays. Recently I made one (and only one in total) comment there and received lots of followers that clearly are spam accounts. In the end, everything depends on type of audience you&#8217;re looking for. Stumbleupon is probably one of the best places for disseminating &#8220;after-work-graphical-content&#8221; as I like to call it.<br />
Again, thank you for visiting my blog and your comment. Highly appreciated!<br />
All the best and keep up the great work.<br />
Cheers<br />
Artur</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top 10 Most Significant Search &#38; Social Marketing Stories of 2011 : Marketing Plus</title>
		<link>http://graviton.me/stumbleupon-vs-digg/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Top 10 Most Significant Search &#38; Social Marketing Stories of 2011 : Marketing Plus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 05:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://graviton.me/?p=358#comment-46</guid>
		<description>[...] Twitter, StumbleUpon, and Reddit hold most of the share of the social news community now. StumbleUpon has 9,642,000 Total Unique Visitors with a +424.8 percent yearly change; Reddit has 3,025,000 Total Unique Visitors and -9.3 percent yearly change, according to comScore. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Twitter, StumbleUpon, and Reddit hold most of the share of the social news community now. StumbleUpon has 9,642,000 Total Unique Visitors with a +424.8 percent yearly change; Reddit has 3,025,000 Total Unique Visitors and -9.3 percent yearly change, according to comScore. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top 10 Most Significant Search &#38; Social Marketing Stories of 2011 - Informatii despre optimizarea pentru motoarele de cautare - SEO ROMANIA</title>
		<link>http://graviton.me/stumbleupon-vs-digg/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Top 10 Most Significant Search &#38; Social Marketing Stories of 2011 - Informatii despre optimizarea pentru motoarele de cautare - SEO ROMANIA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 18:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://graviton.me/?p=358#comment-39</guid>
		<description>[...] Twitter, StumbleUpon, and Reddit hold most of the share of the social news community now. StumbleUpon has 9,642,000 Total Unique Visitors with a +424.8 percent yearly change; Reddit has 3,025,000 Total Unique Visitors and -9.3 percent yearly change, according to comScore. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Twitter, StumbleUpon, and Reddit hold most of the share of the social news community now. StumbleUpon has 9,642,000 Total Unique Visitors with a +424.8 percent yearly change; Reddit has 3,025,000 Total Unique Visitors and -9.3 percent yearly change, according to comScore. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Artur Szalak</title>
		<link>http://graviton.me/stumbleupon-vs-digg/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Artur Szalak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 10:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://graviton.me/?p=358#comment-30</guid>
		<description>Hi Urs,
Thanks for your comment.
It depends what audience you&#039;re looking for. When targeting very specific group I&#039;d rather go to more personal networks such as Facebook and LinkedIn that facilitate better information spread among individuals. From my personal experience, none of the posts on this blog got any attention on StumbleUpon, mostly due to its nature. If you ran, e.g. yet another blog with &quot;shocking&quot; &quot;amazing&quot; etc. pictures, top funny youtube videos etc, then you&#039;d probably got a lot leads from StumbleUpon. I, personally, get more visits from Facebook than Google+.
Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Urs,<br />
Thanks for your comment.<br />
It depends what audience you&#8217;re looking for. When targeting very specific group I&#8217;d rather go to more personal networks such as Facebook and LinkedIn that facilitate better information spread among individuals. From my personal experience, none of the posts on this blog got any attention on StumbleUpon, mostly due to its nature. If you ran, e.g. yet another blog with &#8220;shocking&#8221; &#8220;amazing&#8221; etc. pictures, top funny youtube videos etc, then you&#8217;d probably got a lot leads from StumbleUpon. I, personally, get more visits from Facebook than Google+.<br />
Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Urs E. Gattiker</title>
		<link>http://graviton.me/stumbleupon-vs-digg/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Urs E. Gattiker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 09:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://graviton.me/?p=358#comment-29</guid>
		<description>Arthur

Thanks for this post, just came across it. I have used Stumbleupon but I am not sure if the traffic it brings is really what I want on http://My.ComMetrics.com or our blog for that matter.

So far I have found referrals from Google Plus or blogs like this one are more useful.

thanks for sharing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arthur</p>
<p>Thanks for this post, just came across it. I have used Stumbleupon but I am not sure if the traffic it brings is really what I want on <a href="http://My.ComMetrics.com" rel="nofollow">http://My.ComMetrics.com</a> or our blog for that matter.</p>
<p>So far I have found referrals from Google Plus or blogs like this one are more useful.</p>
<p>thanks for sharing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

